Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Order, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Waqf Property. Court holds that Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain suit regarding waqf property in view of Section 85 of the Maharashtra Waqf Act, 1995.

The applicant, Linker Shelter Pvt. Ltd., filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Decree for Possession of Waqf Property. Defendants' claim of adverse possession fails as Waqf property is not subject to adverse possession under Section 107 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (petitioners) against the decree passed by the Maharashtra Waqf Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Landlord's Failure to Cultivate Land Within One Year of Purchase Triggers Tenant's Right to Purchase Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, regarding agricultural land in Survey No. 341, admeasuring 15 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Remand by Revenue Tribunal Set Aside Due to Failure to Consider Concurrent Findings of Lower Authorities. Widow's Right to Terminate Tenancy Under Section 31 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Upheld.

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the original landlady Smt. Bakulabai Rama Naikwadi, challenged the order dated 20th March 1991 passed by t...