Search Results for "MCGM guidelines"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Municipal Employee Before Age 58 — Violation of Service Regulations. Compulsory retirement at age 55 without following Regulation 25(3) of BMC Service Regulations, 1989 set aside as arbitrary and illegal.

The Petitioner, Smt. Yashoda Bapu Jadhav, was an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was compulsorily retired at the ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arrest in Hoarding Collapse Case — Arrest Held Valid Under Section 41 CrPC. Court finds no violation of D.K. Basu guidelines as grounds of arrest were communicated in writing and arrest memo was served.

The case arises from a catastrophic incident on 13/05/2024 when a large hoarding (64x50 meters, 120 ft high) collapsed on a petrol pump in Mumbai duri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation in Property Dispute Over Open Space. Injunction Denied as Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Possession or Title Over Suit Premises Under Section 38 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from an order dated 10.02.2021 of the City Civil Court at Dindoshi dismissing the Notice of Motion No. 438 of 2021 in L.C.Suit No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Order of Reference to Arbitration in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction. Court Holds That Disputes Involving a Housing Society and Its Members Regarding Development Agreement Are Arbitrable Under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment arises from two appeals filed against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court referring the parties to arbitration under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Unauthorized Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Encroachers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Approval Granted to Cooperative Society of Municipal Tenants.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Pramod Vithal Salgaonkar, the Chief Promoter of Shree Dattaguru CHS (Prop), and another petitioner, challen...