Search Results for "Kotak Mahindra Bank"

141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Criminal Matter Due to Availability of Alternate Remedy. Order Rejecting Application Under Section 156(3) of Criminal Procedure Code is Final and Revisable Under Section 397, Making Writ Petition Under Article 226 Read with Section 482 Not Maintainable.

The dispute originated from Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (the petitioner) filing an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitrator's Interim Order Directing Security in Dredging Contract Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as Arbitrator's Order for Bank Guarantee of Rs. 5,66,30,579/- Upheld Pending Final Award.

The present Commercial Arbitration Petition was filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) by Karanja Terminal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Priority Dispute Between SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act. SARFAESI Act's Express Priority Provisions Under Section 26E Prevail Over MSMED Act's Recovery Mechanism, as No Conflict Exists and Priority Must Be Expressly Provided.

The dispute arose from conflicting recovery claims under the SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act against a debtor, Mission Vivacare, which had defaulted on loa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Notice of Motion for Interim Eviction of Non-Cooperating Members in Housing Society Redevelopment. The Court examines the Society's plea under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 for mandatory orders against members who refuse to vacate despite a majority resolution.

Background: The matter arises from a suit filed by Vikram Delite Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., a cooperative housing society registered under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Official Liquidator to Keep Provision for EPF Claims in Winding Up of Navinon Limited. Court Directs Refund of Excess Payment to EPF Office Kandivali.

This judgment arises from Official Liquidator's Report No.517 of 2015 in Company Petition No.1176 of 2001, concerning M/s.Navinon Limited (In Liquidat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Corrigendum to Award Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Original Award

The petitioners, Karuppiah Mahalingam and others, had availed a loan against mortgaged property from Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited. They defaulted on re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Mumbai Quashes Process in Dishonour of Cheque Cases for Non-Compliance with Section 202 Cr.P.C. — Accused Residing Outside Magistrate's Jurisdiction Requires Mandatory Enquiry Before Issuance of Process.

The petitioners, ASR Systems Private Ltd. and its Managing Director Rohit Wadhwa, were original accused in two complaints filed by Kimberly Clark Hygi...