Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Execution Orders in Arbitration Award Enforcement — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Objections. Court holds that execution court must consider objections under Section 47 CPC before ordering sale of judgment debtor's property.

The petitioner, Sri Ashish K. Philip, was the judgment debtor in execution proceedings arising out of an arbitration award in favor of the respondent,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Arbitral Award Passed Outside State — Stamp Duty Payable Only Where Award is Made Under Section 3 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Arbitral Award Made in Mumbai Not Subject to Karnataka Stamp Duty When Sought to be Executed in Karnataka.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd, a financial institution, entered into a loan agreement with respondents No. 1 and 2. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions of JTOs Challenging Promotion Policy for Training Officers. The court upheld the validity of the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 and the promotion policy based on seniority-cum-merit.

The petitioners, who are Junior Training Officers (JTOs) in various Government Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) in Karnataka, challenged the prom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Despite Completion of Work. Clause 21 of Agreement dated 05/09/1988 constitutes valid arbitration agreement under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Srinivasa Construction (a registered partnership firm) and its partners, filed a petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Stock Broker Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Determined by NSEIL Byelaws, Not by Agreement Clause.

The petitioner, Kantilal Chhaganlal Securities Private Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 April 2010 passed by a panel of ...