Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

688 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition by Company Challenging Rejection of Application Under Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. Petitioner's Application Dated 15.12.2006 Under IPS 2002 Was Rejected on Ground That Scheme Expired on 31.03.2006.

17 Sep 2024

The petitioner, a private limited company, proposed to set up an industrial park named 'Salarpuria Touch Stone' in Bangalore under a Joint Development...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

10 Sep 2024

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

High Court

KAHC030058312022_1

25 Jun 2024

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.

2 Jun 2021

The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Entrustment in Departmental Enquiry — Lack of Consultation with Vigilance Commission. Entrustment of enquiry to Lokayukta without prior consultation with Karnataka State Vigilance Commission under Section 9(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 is invalid and unsustainable.

11 Dec 2020

The petitioners, employees of the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Corporation, challenged the order dated 29.10.2018 of the Managing Direct...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of Recruitment Rules for Civil Judges (Junior Division) — Direct Recruitment Process Upheld. Petitions challenging the selection and seniority dismissed as the Rules were held valid and the process fair.

28 Nov 2019

The petitioners, who were candidates for direct recruitment as Civil Judges (Junior Division) in the Karnataka Judicial Service, challenged the validi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Yamuna Expressway in Public Interest — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4, 6, 17 — Urgency clause invoked for development of expressway project — Court held that acquisition for planned development is valid and compensation must be fair.

2 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh for the construction of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Education and Service Matters — Multiple Petitioners Seek Relief Related to Education and Service Disputes. No specific legal finding extractable as judgment text is limited to the cause title and party list without any substantive content.

21 Dec 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

25 Oct 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.

1 Jan 1970

The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)