Search Results for "Joint Hindu Family Property"

527 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 527 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Finding That Hindu Joint Family Was Not in Existence. Kabuliyat Executed in 1955 and Subsequent Conduct of Parties Established Separation, Barring Claim for Share in Suit Property.

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of a house property situated in Wardha. The plaintiffs claimed that the suit prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Injunction. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Ignoring Documentary Evidence and Failing to Frame Proper Points for Determination Under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC.

The appellant, Kum. Harshada S., filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit for Clubbing Properties in Different Jurisdictions. Section 17 CPC Does Not Permit a Single Suit for Separate Immovable Properties Situated in Different States.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellant (plaintiff) seeking declaration that two properties—one in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ano...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Court Fee Valuation in Partition Suit — Suit Properly Valued Under Section 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

The petitioners, defendant Nos. 3 and 4 in a partition suit (O.S. No. 53/2010) pending before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Udupi, filed a writ pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner unless there is clear ouster and hostile title asserted.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gurudayalsing Bindra (original defendant, now represented by his legal representatives as a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representativ...