Search Results for "Impleading legal representatives"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Will Dispute — Life Estate Holder's Sale Deeds Declared Void. Concurrent Findings of Fact Set Aside as Perverse for Misreading Will.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the suit, filed a second appeal against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Probate in Succession Case — Failure to Implead All Heirs Renders Probate Voidable Under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The appellant, H Srinivas Rao, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order dated 15...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Title Dispute Due to Failure to Establish Title and Upholds High Court's Evidence Appreciation. Appeal Maintained Despite Death of Defendant as Legal Representative Was Already on Record Under Order XLI Rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute originated from a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession filed by P. Ishwari Bai (first plaintiff) and her husband Narso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Will Dispute, Upholds 1935 Will Over 1988 Will. Succession rights determined by earlier valid Will; later Will found illegal and not binding on plaintiffs.

The case involves a property dispute over premises situated at CTS No.212, Nana Peth, Pune. The respondents (original plaintiffs) filed Special Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Passed in Favour of Dead Person Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Proceedings Before Tahsildar Held to Be Judicial in Nature Requiring Impleadment of Legal Heirs.

The petitioner, Dahiben wd/o Manoharbhai Patel through her legal heir Praful s/o Manoharbhai Patel, challenged an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tri...