Search Results for "IPS officers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "IPS officers"

64 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Cessation of Dearness Allowance to Government Employees During COVID-19 Pandemic. Court holds that payment of DA is a statutory right and cannot be stopped without amending rules, and that the PIL was filed with a malafide intention to deprive employees of their legitimate dues.

15 Jan 2024

The petitioners, Forum For Fast Justice through its Secretary Ashish Mehta and Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Land to Judges' Cooperative Housing Society. Allotment of land by MHADA to a cooperative housing society formed by judges was held to be legal and not arbitrary.

29 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Ketan Tirodkar, a citizen of India, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the allotment of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Activist's Petition Seeking Income Tax Returns of Public Figure. Holds That Personal Information of Third Party Cannot Be Disclosed Unless Larger Public Interest Is Established Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005.

11 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Shailesh Gandhi, an RTI activist and former Central Information Commissioner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. The court held that the failure to consider the detenu's representation expeditiously renders the continued detention illegal, emphasizing the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

30 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Ashish Robert Felix, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)