Search Results for "Hardeep Singh case"

105 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 105 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Kidnapping Case: High Court Erred in Mandating Section 319 CrPC Decision Before Cross-Examination. Trial Court's Discretion to Decide Application Under Section 319 CrPC After Cross-Examination Upheld.

The appeal arose from a criminal case where the appellant was accused of attempting to kidnap the complainant (respondent no.2). The FIR was lodged un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons Under Section 319 CrPC Against Witnesses in Murder Trial — No Prima Facie Case for Additional Accused. Summons Issued Without Proper Application of Mind as Evidence Did Not Satisfy Test of Strong Suspicion Under Section 319 CrPC.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed under Sections 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Additional Accused Under Section 319 CrPC in Atrocities Case — Instigation by Co-accused's Husband Sufficient Ground. Evidence of eye-witnesses and complainant disclosed instigation by Respondent No.2, warranting his addition as accused under Section 319 CrPC.

The Petitioner, Jagannath Dattu Torane, the original complainant, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Section 41-A Notice Issued in Uttar Pradesh Fake News FIR; Twitter India Employee Contends No Control Over Platform and No Cause of Action in Karnataka.

The petitioner, Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Limited (TCIPL), holding the designation of Managing Director b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Relatives in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Omnibus Allegations. FIR under Sections 498A, 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and DV Act complaint quashed for lack of specific overt acts against appellants.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by Appellants, quashing criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial discord between (complainant) and her husband ...