KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "Government Consideration"
15869 result(s) found
Found 15869 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.
23 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...
- 690
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions of JTOs Challenging Promotion Policy for Training Officers. The court upheld the validity of the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 and the promotion policy based on seniority-cum-merit.
7 Mar 2017The petitioners, who are Junior Training Officers (JTOs) in various Government Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) in Karnataka, challenged the prom...
- 70
High Court
KAHC010000842011_1
11 Jul 2014The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Grant of Alewadi Port Project to Third Party Under Maharashtra Maritime Board Policies. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Treatment and Non-Consideration of Original Proposal Contrary to Port Policies.
13 Oct 2017The dispute concerns the development of a multipurpose port at Alewadi in Maharashtra under the state's port policies. Petitioner, a UK-based private ...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Challenge by Additional Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors Against Termination Clause in Fresh Appointment Advertisement. Court Examines Whether Clause 7 of 13.03.2015 Advertisement Amounts to Illegal Termination in Violation of Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984, and Article 14 of Constitution of India.
5 May 2015The petitioners, functioning as Additional Government Pleaders, Assistant Government Pleaders, and Additional Public Prosecutors in the High Court of ...
- 12
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Applications under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules. Petitioners sought processing of pre-2016 amendment applications under unamended rules as per Rule 8-B.
16 Aug 2019Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging endorsements issued by the Department of Mines and Geology rejecting ap...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition by BBMP Employees Challenging Promotion of Juniors Based on PUC Qualification. Senior Group D Employees Claim Discrimination as 2014 Clarification Exempted SSLC Holders from PUC Requirement for Promotion to Tax Inspector Posts.
12 Jul 2021The writ petition was filed by seventeen employees of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) working as Group D employees, challenging a promotion ...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Anti-Dumping Duty Recommendation on Flexible Slabstock Polyol from Saudi Arabia and UAE — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Relevant Material. The Designated Authority's final findings dated 01.09.2020 were set aside for non-consideration of the petitioners' submissions and reliance on unsubstantiated data, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
6 Jan 2021The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the final findings dated 01.09.2020 of the D...
- 84
