Search Results for "Fundamental Rule 53(2)"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 and 11 Petitions in License Termination Dispute with Airports Authority of India. Disputes Over Termination of License to Occupy Airport Premises Held Arbitrable Despite Public Premises Act.

The Bombay High Court dealt with three connected proceedings: two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and one app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Considers Plea for Reinstatement and Payment of Subsistence Allowance Following Suspension of Court Employee. Petitioner Alleges Non-Payment of Allowance for Over Seven Years Despite Compliance with Fundamental Rule 53(2).

The petitioner was appointed as Office Assistant in the Tamil Nadu judicial service on 12.12.2012 and later promoted to Record Clerk. While working in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...