Search Results for "Food Analyst"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Food Analyst"

142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction Overturned as Public Analyst Report Lacked Required Terms Under Section 2(1a)(f) and No Evidence Proved Offence Under Section 16(1), with Benefit of Doubt Applied Due to Delay and Tampering Concerns.

30 Jul 2020

The appeal arose from a conviction by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana for offences under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Take Samples in Clean and Dried Bottles as Required Under Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Unreliable.

17 Feb 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Ashishkumar Dineshkumar Patel, proprietor of M/s. New Rajashiri Oil Depot, for offences und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against YouTuber for Disparaging Marico's Products in Video Review. Court holds that false and malicious statements in product reviews can constitute disparagement, and interim injunction can be granted even if defendant is not a competitor.

15 Jan 2020

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a company manufacturing and selling various consumer products including hair oils and foods, filed a suit against the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 by Not Adding Preservative to Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.

26 Aug 2015

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector Suresh Vithal Joshi, appealed against the judgment and order dated 3rd April 2001 passed by the Chief...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Seed Company for Delay in Prosecution After Expiry of Seed Shelf Life — Right to Get Sample Tested from Central Seed Laboratory Under Section 16(3) of Seeds Act, 1966 Violated. The court held that the valuable right of the accused under Section 16(3) of the Seeds Act, 1966 to have the sample tested by the Central Seed Laboratory was infringed because the prosecution was filed after the expiry of the shelf life of the seeds, and such infringement vitiates the prosecution.

16 Jan 2015

The applicants, including the Managing Director of Mahyco Seeds Limited (now Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Company Limited), the company itself, and a propr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Sampling Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

9 Jul 2012

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector S.G. Dharme, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 10/05/2000 passed by the 6th Judici...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Mixing and Sampling from Bulk Container Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

4 Jul 2012

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused Suryabhan Ukarda Rokade for offences under the Prevention of Food Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

28 Oct 2005

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Add Preservative to Milk Sample Before Sending to Public Analyst Renders Prosecution Unsustainable Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

22 Feb 2005

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the acquittal of the respondent, Bhimashankar Chaturbhuj Mehta, who was the p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Division of Sample Leads to Upholding of Acquittal.

22 Feb 2005

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondents-accused by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in Criminal Case No...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)