Search Results for "FIR inconsistency"

375 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 375 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Evidence. Property Dispute Led to Fatal Attack but Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 20th May 1995 passed by the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Evidence of Last Seen and Motive Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal appeal filed by Chandrakant @ Gotya Ramdas Pawar and four others (original accused Nos.1, 2 & 4 to 6) against their co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as medical evidence did not support penetration and delay in FIR was unexplained.

The appellant, Ganesh Kisan Navale, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) for sex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Credible Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Namdeo Haribhau Dayare, Sau. Malu Dyaneshwar Uike, Girish Uttamrao Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Injuries Were Not Life-Threatening and No Intent to Kill Was Established.

The appellant, Kishor s/o Parasram Kosre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Alters Conviction from Section 326 IPC to Section 323 IPC in Water Dispute Assault Case, Permits Compounding. Court finds medical evidence insufficient to prove grievous hurt and allows parties to compound offence after amicable settlement.

The case arises from a dispute between close relatives over drawing water from a common family well on 17 April 2010. The victim and his wife were dra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The appellant, Rambahadur Bhimsingh Vishwakarma, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, on 17th July 2002 for the murder of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as ocular and medical evidence contradicted each other and FIR was delayed.

The appellant, Gorakh Vitthal Tadvi, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Dwarkabai, his relative, by the ...