Search Results for "Export company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Export company"

922 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 922 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in Advance Licence Case — Duty Exemption Denied for Failure to Fulfill Export Obligation. The court held that the respondent-assessee failed to produce evidence of actual use of imported Lauryl Alcohol in the manufacture of export goods, and the extended period of limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 was rightly invoked due to suppression of facts.

6 Jan 2023

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (EP) against a common order dated 24 July 2006 of the Customs Excise and Service Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

10 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

6 Apr 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

High Court

High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Transferor and Transferee Companies Despite Intervenor Objection. Non-Disclosure of Pre and Post Capital Structure in Explanatory Statement Did Not Invalidate Scheme When Shareholders Had Sufficient Information Under Section 393 of Companies Act, 1956.

31 Jan 2006

The transferor company, Chemidye Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd., and the transferee company, Thirumalai Chemicals Ltd., both engaged in similar chemi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Policy Condition Precedent Not Fulfilled. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation's denial of claim upheld as appellant failed to comply with mandatory condition requiring prior approval for extending credit period beyond policy terms.

25 Jun 2026

The appellant, Prakruthi Products Pvt. Ltd., an exporter of herbal extracts, held an export credit insurance policy with the Export Credit Guarantee C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claim for Exported Biscuits Despite Exemption Notification — Revenue Cannot Retain Duty Paid Without Authority of Law. The court held that exemption notification No.3/2006-CE is not applicable to exported goods as retail sale price in rupees is not required on export packages, and duty paid is validly claimable as rebate under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

21 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Parle Products Ltd., is a company engaged in manufacturing biscuits and confectioneries. Biscuits are excisable goods under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Admiralty Suit for Recovery of Value of Goods Lost Due to Non-Issuance of Bill of Lading. Claim Against Vessel Owner and Agent for Breach of Duty Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act is Examined.

9 Aug 2005

This admiralty suit was filed by the plaintiff, Geetanjali Woollen Pvt. Ltd., seeking recovery of US$ 57,860 with interest for the loss of export good...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows GST Refund Claim for Export of Services, Holds That Unjust Enrichment Provisions Do Not Apply When Tax Incidence Is Not Passed On to Any Person in India. The Court interpreted Section 54(8)(d) of CGST Act, 2017 and held that in case of export of services, the foreign client is not a 'person' for the purpose of unjust enrichment, and the refund cannot be rejected on that ground.

9 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Jar Productions Private Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, engaged in providing production services to ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017

5 Jun 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that denial of benefits under Para 4.1.5 of Foreign Trade Policy on ground of non-fulfillment of condition of minimum value addition is unsustainable as the condition was not applicable to the product in question.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)