Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "Due Procedure"
17374 result(s) found
Found 17374 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 932
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Chamber Summons to Strike Out Affidavit of Evidence in Specific Performance Suit — Affidavit of Evidence Not a Pleading Under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC. Court Holds That Averments Not in Written Statement May Be Allowed If They Do Not Introduce a New Case or Cause Prejudice.
20 Mar 2013The Plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of a contract based on an unsigned MOU. The Defendant filed a written statement after a delay of ...
- 136
High Court
KAHC010212612022_1
15 Jul 2022The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed before the High Court of Karnataka seeking to quash FIR No....
- 44
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Landlords' Appeal in Kerala Rent Control Case — Holds That Section 12(3) Eviction Order Can Be Passed Without Fresh Section 12(1) Application During Appeal. The Court interpreted Section 12 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 to hold that the Rent Control Appellate Authority has power to pass eviction order for non-payment of rent during appeal without requiring a fresh application under Section 12(1).
21 Nov 2025The case involves two shops in Kochi, Kerala, taken on monthly rent by the respondent-tenant from the appellants-landlords. The landlords alleged that...
- 265
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
6 May 2026The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...
- 211
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears CBI's Appeal Against Acquittal in British Minor's Death Case; Trial Court Found CBI Investigation Invalid Without Proper Authorization. The trial court held that the CBI chargesheet was a fresh one and not a supplementary chargesheet, and that no notification empowered the CBI to register a new FIR in Mumbai.
17 Jul 2019The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed an appeal under Section 378(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor/Son Despite Challenge by Daughter on Grounds of Forgery and Unnaturalness. Court holds that propounder proved due execution and attestation under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and that exclusion of natural heir was explained by prior gifts and strained relations.
30 Mar 2023The present Testamentary Suit sought Probate in respect of a Writing dated 24th March 1997 (‘the said Will’), which the Plaintiff propounded as be...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Application for Enforcement of Scheme in Sanghi Motors (Bombay) Limited. Scheme formulated under Sections 397, 398, 402 of Companies Act, 1956 involves transfer of oxygen undertaking assets and cylinders.
21 Feb 2006The matter pertains to Company Application No.328 of 1990 arising out of Company Petition No.128 of 1985, filed before the High Court of Judicature at...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Auction Purchaser Cannot Dispossess Without Due Process. Prior Possession and Forcible Dispossession Within Six Months Entitle Plaintiff to Restoration Irrespective of Title.
5 Apr 2018The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Mr. Kadir Ilahi Bagwan (applicant) challenging the judgment and order dated 25th July 2016 pas...
- 199
