Search Results for "Disability pension"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.15 Lakhs Enhanced to Rs.27 Lakhs for 70% Disabled Mechanical Engineer. Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 14 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Pratap Dandapani Padhi, a 43-year-old Mechanical Engineer working as a Foreman at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited with a monthly s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Attempt Limit for PwBD Candidates in Civil Services Examination. Classification Between SC/ST and OBC/General PwBD Candidates Held Reasonable Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, a person with 57% multiple disability (locomotor and low vision), challenged Rule 3 of the Civil Services Examinatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Family Pension Claim Under CRPF Rules — Liberal Interpretation of 'Family' Includes Widow Despite Husband's Remarriage. The Court held that the definition of 'family' under Rule 5 of CRPF Rules, 1971 includes the first wife, and denial of pension would be unjust.

The petitioner, Smt. Ranjana w/o Bhaskar Anasane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking family pension as the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Due to Lack of Sufficient Evidence. Claim for Samman Pension under Freedom Fighter Pension Scheme, 1972 rejected as petitioner failed to prove participation in Hyderabad Liberation Movement with credible documentary evidence.

The petitioner, Shri Ramkishan s/o. Narhari Sangewar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 4th August 2004 rejecting his claim for Samman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Visually Impaired Employee Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Termination Based on Pre-Act Medical Report Held Invalid as Employer Failed to Consider Alternative Employment Under Section 47 of the Act.

The petitioner, Ashok Dhondu Ahire, was appointed as a Peon on 28/04/1981 and later worked as a Messenger. By letter dated 22/09/1987, the Board of Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Visually Impaired Peon Against Termination Due to 100% Disability. Holds That 40% Minimum Disability Requirement Under Advertisement Cannot Override Statutory Provisions of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

The petitioner, Patel Suleman Gaibi, who is 100% visually disabled, applied for the post of peon in the Irrigation Department of the State of Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Employees of Sheltered Workshop for Handicapped - Government Resolution of 1984 Extended to Workshop Employees

The petitioners, employees of the Sheltered Workshop Section of Home for Aged and Handicapped, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Disabled Employee Against Termination by Pune Municipal Corporation. Termination of services due to disability acquired during service violates the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.

The petitioner, Shri Prakash Vinayak Naik, was employed as a Subordinate Engineer with the Pune Municipal Corporation. He was initially certified as p...