Search Results for "Customs Confiscation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Customs Confiscation"

216 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.

15 Dec 2022

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Second Buyer of Imported Car, Sets Aside Duty Demand and Penalty. The Court held that once confiscation of a vehicle becomes final due to non-exercise of the redemption option, no customs duty can be demanded from a subsequent purchaser and no penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 is sustainable.

30 Apr 2019

The appeal was filed by Gagandeep Singh Anand under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the order dated 28 July 2017 of the Customs, Exc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Customs Appeals on Import of Multi-Function Devices — Redemption of Restricted Goods Permitted on Payment of Market Value. Import of used MFDs without authorisation under Foreign Trade Policy held redeemable under Section 125 Customs Act, 1962, as restricted items, not prohibited.

24 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the Commissioner of Customs against the release of imported Multi-Function Devices (MFDs) by the respondents, M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeals in Confiscation of Pay Orders — Genuine Foreign Exchange Transactions Not Sale Proceeds of Smuggled Goods. Pay orders received by FFMC for sale of foreign exchange in genuine transactions cannot be confiscated under Section 121 of the Customs Act, 1962 merely because the purchaser's bank account contained proceeds of smuggling.

30 Mar 2012

The appellant, Weizmann Limited, a Full Fledged Money Changer (FFMC), sold foreign exchange to various purchasers and received pay orders from banks. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal in Rig Import Valuation Case — Upholds Reassessment Based on Higher Transaction Value. Customs Duty Demand on 'Pride Pennsylvania' Rig Upheld as Invoice Value Not Sole Determinant Under Customs Act, 1962.

24 Apr 2006

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) which h...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Act Case — Master of Vessel Solely Liable for Import Manifest Errors. Agents Filing Manifest on Behalf of Master Not Liable Under Sections 30 and 148(2) of Customs Act, 1962.

5 Apr 2006

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports) against M/s Patvolk and M/s Shahi Containers. The dispute arose from the arrival ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Importing Customs Recovery Provisions for Excise Duty Interest. Section 12 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Validly Empowers Application of Customs Act Recovery Mechanisms for Interest on Delayed Payment of Excise Duty.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Krishnakant Sakharam Ghag, a partner of M/s Amit Textile Processors, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the va...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Abdulla Gulam Mustafa, challenged a detention order dated 27.11.2003 issued by the Principal Secretary (A...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)