Search Results for "Consolidation scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Consolidation scheme"

147 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Quashes Pre-deposit Order in Customs Dispute. Merger of Sick Company with Petitioner Under SICA Extinguishes Pre-deposit Liability, and Revenue Authorities Are Bound by the BIFR Scheme.

7 Jan 2026

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director G...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Waiver of Pre-Deposit in Customs Dispute. BIFR Scheme Binding on Government Departments; Pre-Deposit Condition Quashed for Sick Industrial Company Under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944.

7 Jan 2026

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director General o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Safety Regulation and Government Exemption Order Under Electricity Act, 2003. The Court addressed whether Regulation 116 is ultra vires, if transfer schemes protect unqualified employees, and the arbitrariness of a Government Order granting exemptions from safety qualifications.

18 Feb 2022

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed in the High Court of Kerala challenging Regulation 116 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measure...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Tenancy Land Dispute — Petitioner Fails to Prove Deemed Purchase Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Mere Revenue Entry as 'Kabjedar' Insufficient to Establish Tenancy Rights; Inordinate Delay in Filing Revision Also Fatal.

24 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Vitthal Maruti Bulunge, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Inventory Proceedings Dispute — Clarifies Appointment of Cabeca-de-casal and Maintainability of Common Inventory for Spouses with Different Heirs. The court held that the lower courts had erred in their orders regarding the appointment of Cabeca-de-casal and the maintainability of a common inventory proceeding under the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867, as applicable in Goa.

24 Nov 2017

The case involves a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: one dated 13.10.2015 passed by the l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The Court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Jan 2016

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural lands filed by the original plaintiff (respondent no.1) against t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sale of Fragment to Adjacent Owner Under Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Sale of Fragment to Owner of Adjacent Survey Number is Valid as 'Contiguous Owner' Includes Owner of Adjacent Land.

27 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Balwantrao Bhagwantrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition challenging the sale of a fragment of land (Survey No. 7/1) by respondent No. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Petitioners Failed to Show Prejudice from Entry Made During Consolidation Proceedings. Mutation entries do not confer title; proper remedy is civil suit under Article 226 of Constitution.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) c...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)