Search Results for "Cenvat Credit"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Petitioner Entitled to Interest on Delayed Refund Under Section 127 of Finance Act, 2019. The court held that the respondents' delay in refunding the amount under the scheme attracts interest liability.

The petitioner, Quant Broking Pvt Ltd, a stock broker and member of various stock exchanges, filed a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Inaction on GST Registration Cancellation Application — Failure to Consider Application Within Statutory Period Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles and Developers Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Input Tax Credit Based on Annual Audited Accounts in KVAT Act Cases. The court held that Section 10(3) of the KVAT Act permits availment of input tax credit based on the annual audited statement in Form VAT 240, irrespective of the claim in returns under Section 35.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by M/s MFAR Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Mangalore Force, challenging the interpretation of Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cenvat Credit Case — Clarificatory Amendment Retrospective. Removal of capital goods without use triggers credit reversal under Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The appellant, M/s. Betts India Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) confirming the demand for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order in Service Tax Case — Limitation Bar Not Applicable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds when the appeal was filed within the prescribed period under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, M/s. Practice Strategic Communications India Private Limited, a company providing management services, was issued a show cause notice ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Pre-Deposit Order in Cenvat Credit Case — Directs Reconsideration of Appeal Without Pre-Deposit. Conditional waiver of pre-deposit set aside as petitioners demonstrated financial hardship and prima facie case.

The petitioners, M/s. Goradia Special Steels Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...