Search Results for "COD"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Petitioner Challenging Tender Rejection by KPTCL - No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Battery Energy Storage System Tender Process

The petitioner, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of its bid in a tender process...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Complaint Due to Bar Under SICA Section 22A. Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot continue against a sick company without BIFR consent.

The petitioners, a company and its directors, challenged the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 25th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Banking Ombudsman Dispute Over Counterfeit Drafts. Limitation Act Does Not Apply to Proceedings Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2002.

The petitioner, Bank of Baroda, challenged an arbitral award passed by the Banking Ombudsman (respondent no.2) in favor of respondent no.1, Vijaya Ban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Chandrakant Digambar Tanksale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Mohan, his cousin, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Adjudication Proceedings in FERA Case Due to Inordinate Delay of 27 Years. Revival of show cause notices after 27 years held arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Cambata Industries Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wr...