Search Results for "CESTAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "CESTAT order"

321 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Customs Duty Dispute Over Installation of High Performance Liquid Chromatograph Machine in Laboratory Attached to Factory. The court considered whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming the demand of duty despite regularisation by DGFT and amendment of notification widening the scope of 'factory'.

11 Mar 2026

The case involves a Tax Appeal filed by Atlas Dye Chem Industries against the Union of India and others, arising from a dispute over customs duty exem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2 May 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Customs Appeal in Customs Broker Licensing Case — First Breach Considered Mitigating Factor. The court upheld the CESTAT order reducing penalty for Mahavir Logistics, a customs broker, on the ground that it was the first breach under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013.

7 Dec 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs (General) appealed against an order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Agricultural Produce Market Committees in Service Tax Case on Exemption Grounds. The court upheld service tax liability for renting immovable property pre-01.07.2012, ruling that the activity was not a statutory duty under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 and exemption under Circular No.89/7/2006 does not apply.

23 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, addressed a group of appeals filed by various Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Agri...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Broker License Suspension Case — Prohibition Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. CESTAT's Order Restoring Customs Broker License Upheld as Show Cause Notice and Hearing Were Not Provided Before Issuing Prohibition Orders Under Section 108 of Customs Act, 1962.

12 Jan 2022

The Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore Division, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the Final Order No.A/20356/20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.

30 Jul 2014

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. The Court held that the Tribunal must consider prima facie case, balance of convenience, and financial hardship while deciding waiver of predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

1 Mar 2012

The appellant, Hyva (India) Private Limited, is engaged in body building on motor vehicle chassis supplied by Tata Motors Limited. Tata Motors clears ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Reducing Redemption Fine and Penalty Without Reasons. Tribunal's reliance on non-binding precedent from another bench held improper as it ignored its own earlier order.

21 Mar 2006

The Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Customs, Excise and...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)