Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

331 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Challenging Customs Broker's Penalty Under Section 114AA, Questions Jurisdiction Over MEIS Classification. Three substantial questions of law framed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1944 regarding the authority of customs to penalise for MEIS scrip classification and applicability of Section 28/28AAA.

15 Apr 2026

The matter concerned an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1944 before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, filed by a licensed Custo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

30 Jun 2014

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Export Refund Case — Condition for Export of Services Post-27.02.2010 is Only Payment in Convertible Foreign Exchange. The court held that after omission of clause (a) of subrule (2) of Rule 3 of Export of Service Rules, 2005, the only condition for export is receipt of payment in convertible foreign exchange.

15 Sep 2014

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III, filed six appeals under the Central Excise Act against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

21 Apr 2021

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

8 Sep 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.

30 Jul 2014

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Dispute on Exempted Goods. CENVAT Credit on Engraved Printing Cylinders Allowed Where Supplier's Duty Payment Not Challenged by Jurisdictional Officer.

19 Dec 2024

The Appellant-Revenue filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 20 October 2023 of the Customs, Excise...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case on Redemption Fine and Penalty for Excess Goods Cleared Under Bond. The Court held that once confiscation of goods under Sections 111(l), (m) and (o) of the Customs Act, 1962 is upheld, imposition of redemption fine under Section 125 and penalty under Section 112(a) is mandatory and not discretionary.

18 Jul 2023

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Import) against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. Services Provided by Respondent to Overseas Manufacturers Held Not Classifiable as Business Auxiliary Services and Treated as Export of Services.

31 Jul 2017

The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, appealed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 07-01-2015 passed by the Cu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act Maintainable on Limitation Issue Even When Valuation/Rate of Duty Not Disputed. The Court ruled that the question of limitation is a distinct legal issue not relating to assessment, valuation, or rate of duty, and thus appeals challenging only the time-bar aspect are maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G.

23 Dec 2021

The case arose from a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)