Search Results for "Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946"

122 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Senior Sales Executive Challenging Termination — Holds He Is Not an 'Employee' Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court affirmed that the petitioner's supervisory and managerial role excluded him from the definition of employee under Section 3(5) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

26 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Mr. Jobi Joseph, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1 April 2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Restraining Transfer of Employees in Print Media Company. Transfer of Senior Printers to Other Locations Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, The Indian Express (P) Limited and its two officers, challenged an order dated 28 November 2022 passed by the learned Member, Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Union's Claim for Priority Over Secured Creditor in Non-Functional Company. The court held that under the SARFAESI Act, the secured creditor's rights prevail over employees' dues when the company is not wound up, but directed sympathetic consideration of employees' claims.

30 Aug 2022

The writ petition was filed by Khandelwal Tube Mill Kamgar Sangh, a registered trade union representing employees of Khandelwal Tube Mill (the Company...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reversal of Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of Probationers Without Inquiry Held Illegal Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

4 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Chandan Bapurao Karwade and Rajesh Bharatlal Pande, were appointed on 18 April 1995 as Accountant and Instructor respectively in a te...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Closure of Textile Mills Under Section 250 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Reinstatement of Retrenched Workers Denied Due to Financial Non-Viability. Closure Application Approved by Appropriate Government and Industrial Tribunal; Retrenchment Compensation Paid; No Justification for Reopening or Reinstatement.

9 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Standard Mills (Textile Division of Standard Industries Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had been in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions of Employees Challenging Termination by Medical Trust. Private Trust Not 'State' Under Article 12; No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Disciplinary Proceedings.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioners, employees of Pravara Medical Trust, a private trust running a medical college and hospital, were terminated from service after discip...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Ayurvedic Doctors Seeking Pay Parity with MBBS Doctors — Ayurvedic Doctors Not 'Workmen' Under Industrial Disputes Act. The Court held that Ayurvedic doctors employed by Nagpur Municipal Corporation are not 'workmen' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as they perform duties of a supervisory/managerial nature and are not engaged in manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical, or supervisory work as defined.

30 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Nagpur Mahanagar Palika Samanvaya Chikitsak Sangh, a union of Ayurvedic doctors employed by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, filed a ...

High Court

High Court Upholds Finding of Unfair Labour Practice in Layoff Case but Remands for Determination of Back Wages. Employer's Failure to Pay Layoff Compensation Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

2 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Maharashtra Cylinders (Pvt.) Ltd., an industry engaged in manufacturing gas cylinders at Kalmeshwar, Nagpur, challenged the order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order for Reinstatement of Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal. The court held that the burden to prove abandonment lies on the employer and that termination without notice or compensation under Section 25F is void.

20 Dec 2013

The judgment arises from two writ petitions: Writ Petition No.248 of 2011 filed by Kamala Mills Limited challenging the order of the 1st Labour Court,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Favor of Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Transfer of Badli Workers to Different Department on Confirmation Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

12 Jan 2005

The case involves a writ petition filed by M/s. Prakash Cotton Mills Ltd. challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 26th July 2001....

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)