Search Results for "BTM Layout"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "BTM Layout"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Against Order Rejecting Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Partition and Declaration. Trial Court Found No Cause of Action and Allowed Application Filed by Defendants 24 and 26; Appeal Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Triable Issues.

29 Jun 2026

The present Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiffs against the order dated 14.10.2019...

High Court

Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka Decides Regular First Appeal in a Partition, Declaration and Injunction Suit. The Court Allows or Dismisses the Appeal Based on the Merits of the Case.

29 Jun 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging BBMP Property Tax Reassessment. Court upholds BBMP's power to revise property tax under Section 108A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, holding that the capital value method is valid and that reassessment does not require prior notice if done in accordance with law.

11 Dec 2023

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by property owners in Bengaluru challenging the reassessment of property tax by the Bruhath Bengal...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement Without Sanction — Proceedings Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Violation of Regulation 16(3) of BESCOM/KPTCL CDA Regulations, 1975

17 Jul 2019

The petitioners, former employees of BESCOM and KPTCL, retired from service between 2014 and 2016. After their retirement, disciplinary proceedings we...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Police Constable's Knee Injury. Tribunal's finding of negligence and quantum of compensation affirmed as no grounds for interference under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

9 Jan 2013

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by D. Ramesh, a police constable, who sustained a knee injury when his motorcycle was hit by a Marut...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)