Search Results for "Axis Bank"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Axis Bank"

215 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 215 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Payment of Provident Fund Dues from Bank Sale Proceeds. Section 11(2) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 creates a first charge over assets of the establishment, overriding the claims of a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act.

16 Jun 2026

The petitioner, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of SBI Consortium in Corporate Guarantee Dispute Under IBC. Corporate Guarantees Executed by Corporate Debtor Constitute Financial Debt Under Section 5(8) of IBC, 2016, and Are Enforceable Despite Timing and Stamping Objections.

28 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Appellant Consortium against the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Case — Order Rejecting Intervention Application Not an Interim Order Under Section 18. The court held that an order rejecting an application for intervention under Order I Rule 10 CPC is not an 'interim order' under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, and therefore an appeal lies before the DRAT.

29 Jan 2025

The petitioner, G. Corp Lotus Mall Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action Against All Defendants Including Those Alleged to Be Benami. The court held that allegations of sham and benami transactions in a suit for specific performance constitute a cause of action and cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

19 Jun 2021

The Appellants, original Plaintiffs, filed Suit No. 187 of 1993 seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 1st August 1985 in respect ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes Transfer Petition in Matrimonial Case Based on Mediated Settlement. The court directed the parties to file for divorce by mutual consent in Kolkata and implement property settlement terms, including withdrawal of pending cases and transfer of assets, as per the agreement reached through mediation.

8 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India dealt with a transfer petition filed by the husband seeking to transfer a matrimonial case from Kolkata to New Delhi. The p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Regarding Security Interest and Pledge of Shares — NCLAT Order Set Aside. The Court held that the Corporate Debtor's creation of security by way of pledge of shares of its subsidiary in favour of the appellants constituted a valid security interest under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the moratorium under Section 14 does not bar the enforcement of such security by a secured creditor.

24 Aug 2020

The present appeal arises from an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 24.08.2020, which dismissed the appeal filed by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Dispute — Application Under Section 7 Held Barred by Limitation. Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Does Not Extend Limitation for Initiating CIRP Under IBC.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Babulal Vardharji Gurjar, a director of Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., against the order of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

24 May 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging MSME Facilitation Council Reference and Award — Held That Section 18 of MSMED Act, 2006 Does Not Require Prior Agreement for Reference and That Limitation Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to Setting Aside of Award.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Morarjee Textiles Ltd., its Head of Finance, and its Executive Director and Chairperson, challengi...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)