Search Results for "Authorization"

503 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 503 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Fair Price Shop Authorization for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's license cancelled without show-cause notice or hearing, violating principles of natural justice under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Yelladakere Prathamika Krushi Pattina Sahakara Sangha (R), a cooperative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, repr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Online Liquor Delivery Platform in Excise License Dispute. The court held that the petitioner's order processing and delivery services do not amount to 'sale' under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and quashed the Excise Commissioner's letter demanding a license.

The petitioner, Hip Bar Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, offering a semi-closed prepaid payment instrument (mobile ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Criminal Trespass on Gayran Land — Cultivation of Grazing Land Without Authorization Not Trespass if Done Under Claim of Right. Regularization of Gayran Land for Non-Grazing Purposes Requires Compliance with Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The judgment arises from a criminal application filed by eight applicants seeking quashing of FIR No. 57/2015 registered with Dahihanda Police Station...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Shop Structure. Tenant Failed to Prove Authorization Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and Withdrawal of Earlier Notice Did Not Bar Fresh Action.

The appellant, Maneklal N. Shah alias Kothari, was the original plaintiff in a suit filed against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Filed by Power of Attorney Holder Without Proper Authorization. Power of Attorney Holder Must Have Proper Authorization to File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The applicant, A.C. Narayanan, was the accused in multiple complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by the responde...