High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Fair Price Shop Authorization for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's license cancelled without show-cause notice or hearing, violating principles of natural justice under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Yelladakere Prathamika Krushi Pattina Sahakara Sangha (R), a cooperative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, represented by its Chief Executive Officer, D. Ninganna, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petitioner sought to quash the impugned notification bearing No. FS D/HO NYA BE AN. C R/305/2024-25 dated 01.09.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent, the Joint Director, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Chitradurga. The notification cancelled the petitioner's authorization to run a fair price shop. The petitioner contended that the cancellation was arbitrary, illegal, unjust, and unconstitutional as it was passed without issuing any show-cause notice or providing an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents, represented by the learned AGA, accepted notice. The court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel and the AGA, examined the matter at the preliminary hearing stage. The court found that the impugned notification was indeed issued without any prior notice or hearing, which is a fundamental breach of the principles of natural justice. The court held that such an order cannot be sustained in law and is liable to be quashed. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned notification, and directed the respondents to restore the petitioner's authorization and permit the petitioner to continue running the fair price shop. The court also granted liberty to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, if so advised, after providing a show-cause notice and an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Right to be heard - Cancellation of license without show-cause notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal - The petitioner's fair price shop authorization was cancelled by the Joint Director without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing, which is a clear violation of the principles of natural justice - Held that such an order cannot be sustained and is liable to be quashed (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned notification cancelling the petitioner's fair price shop authorization without issuing a show-cause notice or providing an opportunity of hearing is arbitrary, illegal, and violative of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned notification bearing No. FS D/HO NYA BE AN. C R/305/2024-25 dated 01.09.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent is quashed. The respondents are directed to restore the petitioner's authorization and permit the petitioner to continue running the fair price shop. Liberty is reserved to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law, if so advised, after providing a show-cause notice and an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • audi alteram partem
  • right to be heard
  • cancellation of license without notice
  • writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (10) 21

WP No. 29467 of 2025 (GM-PDS)

2025-10-16

Suraj Govindaraj

Sri Abhishek M B, Advocate for petitioner; Smt. K.P Yashodha, AGA for respondents

Yelladakere Prathamika Krushi Pattina Sahakara Sangha (R), Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, D.Ninganna

The Commissioner, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department, Bengaluru; The Deputy Commissioner (Food), Chitradurga; The Joint Director, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Chitradurga; The Deputy Director and Competent Authority, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Chitradurga; The Tahashildar, Hiriyuru Taluk Office, Hiriyur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cancellation of fair price shop authorization.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned notification dated 01.09.2025 cancelling the petitioner's authorization to run a fair price shop.

Filing Reason

The impugned notification was issued without any show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the impugned notification cancelling the petitioner's fair price shop authorization without issuing a show-cause notice or providing an opportunity of hearing is arbitrary, illegal, and violative of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the impugned notification was issued without any show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing, making it arbitrary, illegal, and unconstitutional. Respondents accepted notice but did not file any counter; the court proceeded based on the petitioner's submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

An order cancelling a license or authorization without issuing a show-cause notice or providing an opportunity of hearing is a clear violation of the principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained in law. Such an order is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a. 'Issue/pass an order in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned notification...' 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; ... 3. The impugned notification has been issued without any show-cause notice or opportunity of hearing having been given to the petitioner. As such, the same is in violation of the principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru on an unspecified date. The matter came up for preliminary hearing on 16.10.2025, when the learned AGA accepted notice for the respondents. After hearing the petitioner's counsel and the AGA, the court passed the final order on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Affidavit-in-Evidence in DV Act Proceedings — Section 28(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Allows Court to Lay Down Its Own Procedure. Husband's Objection to Wife's Affidavit...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission Order Allowing Exemption for Imported Ferrari Despite Temporary UK Registration. Temporary registration for transit purposes does not disqualify a vehicle from exemption under Notification 21/2002-CUS a...