W.P.NOS.16428 OF 2025, 25868 OF 2024, 25869 OF 2024,
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Article 144"
552 result(s) found
Found 552 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Lack of Proper Opportunity of Hearing and Non-Communication of Section 151 Approval in Income Tax Reopening Proceedings. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to grant a personal hearing as directed by the earlier order of the High Court and did not communicate the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rendering the reassessment invalid.
20 Dec 2024The petitioner, Wavy Construction LLP, challenged an order dated 14 October 2021 rejecting its objections against reopening of assessment under Sectio...
- 542
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 466
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Wakf Board Notification Including Service Inam Lands in Dargah Property. Errata Notification Adding Lands to Wakf Property Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Wakf Act, 1995.
7 Feb 2022The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that upheld an Errata Notification issued b...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detenu's alleged dangerous activities did not disturb public order, only law and order, and the detaining authority failed to consider that the detenu was already in custody.
4 Mar 2020The petitioner, Siddhesh Bala Mhaskar @ Siddhu Abhange, challenged a preventive detention order passed on 28th August 2019 by the Commissioner of Poli...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Vesting of Land in State for Violation of Scheduled Tribe Land Transfer Restrictions. Exchange of Land by Scheduled Tribe Member Without Prior Permission and in Disproportionate Value is Void Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.
3 Mar 2020The case involves an appeal by the Additional Commissioner, Revenue and others against the judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court which set aside orde...
- 387
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tax Dispute Over Buy-Back of Shares Under Section 115QA of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that buy-back pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, is not covered by Section 115QA as it stood prior to the amendment effective from 01.06.2016.
22 Nov 2019The appellant, Genpact India Private Limited, a domestic unlisted company, bought back shares from its sole shareholder, Genpact India Investment, Mau...
- 199
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Sections 302, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC and Bombay Police Act Set Aside
12 Apr 2019The case pertains to the murder of Hanif @ Allabakshish Allauddin Shaikh on 07/10/2008. Nine persons were accused of offences under Sections 302, 143,...
- 146
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Society's Possession Claim in Tenant Copartnership Housing Society Dispute — Transfer of Flat Without Consent Invalid Under Bye-Laws and Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that the petitioner, claiming through an invalid transfer, is in illegal occupation and liable to be evicted.
7 Jul 2015The writ petition was filed by Tedco Exports Pvt. Ltd. challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court which allowed the ap...
- 305
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
14 Jun 2010The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...
- 78
