Search Results for "Arbitration Act 1940"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act, Condoning 258-Day Delay. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Partnership Disputes Arising from Deed of Alteration of Partnership Dated 10 April 2013.

The applicant, Infra Poonam Developers LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitrator Appointment in ISRO Contract Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Appointment by Delhi Arbitration Centre without consent of Union of India held invalid under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India represented by the Ministry of Space (ISRO), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order Due to Insufficiently Stamped MOU. Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Underlying Agreement Was Insufficiently Stamped Under Section 35 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The appeal arose from an order dated 30 August 2013 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Thane, allowing an application filed by the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions, Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution of Firm Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves two arbitration petitions challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...