Search Results for "Appeal Against Order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Appeal Against Order"

30036 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30036 result(s)

Tribunals

NCLAT Chennai Adjudicates on Condonation of Delay in Company Appeal, Considering Supreme Court's COVID-19 Limitation Extension. The Court examined whether the appeal filed on 28.05.2021 against the 31.01.2020 order approving resolution plan was within time in light of Section 61 IBC and the Supreme Court's orders excluding limitation period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022.

1 Jan 1970

The case arose from an appeal against the National Company Law Tribunal order dated 31.01.2020 approving a resolution plan for Vaksh Steels Pvt. Ltd. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Income Tax Department's Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 276CC Case — Magistrate's Closure Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Cognizance Notice Under Section 279(1) of Income Tax Act. The court held that the requirement of sanction under Section 279(1) is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing the complaint, and the Magistrate's closure order was premature.

19 Jul 2022

The Income Tax Department filed multiple criminal appeals against the order dated 03.04.2021 passed by the Magistrate of JMFC-III Court, Belagavi, rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Scope of Hearing at Admission Stage of Victim's Appeal Under Proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. — No Leave Required, Summary Dismissal Permissible After Hearing. The court held that the appeal by a victim against acquittal is a matter of right and the procedure under Section 384 Cr.P.C. applies, allowing summary dismissal after hearing.

1 Feb 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of hearing at the admission stage of an appeal filed by a victim under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power.

13 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to DRAT Order Upholding DRT Dismissal of Recall of Ex-Parte Decree in Debt Recovery Proceedings. Petitioners Contend Non-Service of Summons and Advocate's Mere Filing of Vakalatnama Cannot Waive Service, Which Is Essential for Written Statement.

12 Sep 2022

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal da...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Setting Aside Dismissal of Suit for Default. Appellate Court's Order Condoning Delay Upheld as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Appearance Due to Lack of Knowledge of Transfer of Suit Under Order IX Rule 8 CPC and Section 5 of Limitation Act.

2 Feb 2026

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No. 227 of 2016, filed a suit which was initially before the Pavi Jetpur Court, then transf...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Decides Multiple Letters Patent Appeals. The Decision Involves First Appeals and Related Disputes.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Rejecting Application Under Section 151 CPC for Reopening of Evidence — Trial Court Failed to Exercise Jurisdiction Under Article 227. The court held that inherent powers under Section 151 CPC can be invoked to reopen evidence to secure ends of justice, and the trial court's refusal to allow the plaintiff to be examined in person was a failure to exercise jurisdiction.

31 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Jabeena Hussaini, represented by her power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

14 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Compulsory Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act. Suit Seeking Declaration That Compulsory Purchase Order Stood Abrogated Was Barred by Section 269-UN and Section 293 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Exclude Civil Court Jurisdiction.

25 Apr 2025

The appeal was filed against the order dated 7th April 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)