Search Results for "temporary employment"

1170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Hears Habeas Corpus Petition Filed by Mother Seeking Custody of Minor Son Born in Canada. The Case Involves Legal Issues Regarding Custody Jurisdiction When the Child is a Canadian Citizen and the Father Resides in India.

The present petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of habeas corpus for production of the minor son and his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award in Wage Reference Due to Failure to Apply Settled Principles. The Court Remands the Proceedings for Fresh Adjudication, Holding That Both Region-cum-Industry and Parity Principles Were Not Properly Followed.

This judgment from the Bombay High Court concerns three writ petitions challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal in a wage reference between Hin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Government Orders on Full Wage Payment During Lockdown Under Disaster Management Act. Employers Must Pay Full Wages to Workers During COVID-19 Lockdown Period, Section 10(2)(l) of Disaster Management Act, 2005 Valid.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions filed by employers and employers' associations challenging the constitutional validity of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Refusing Return of Plaint in Suit for Possession of Garage. Court Holds That Question of Valuation and Court Fee Is a Mixed Question of Law and Fact to Be Decided at Trial, Not Under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Ganpat Govind Shigvan, was a defendant in Suit No. 2151 of 2010 filed by the respondent, Preeti Paresh Shah, and her mother for posses...