Search Results for "reference under Industrial Disputes Act"

1788 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1788 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Appeals Against Single Judge Order Quashing SARFAESI Auction Sale. Single Judge Had Canceled Sale Deed of Agricultural Land for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Requirements and Prohibition on Selling Agricultural Land under SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a borrower challenging the auction sale of his property under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Training Under Industrial Disputes Act — Trainee Not a Workman Under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Training Agreement Did Not Create Employer-Employee Relationship, Hence No Retrenchment.

The petitioner, Nilesh Shivaji Sapkar, was initially appointed by respondent no.4, Volkswagen India Private Limited, for a fixed period of six months ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM Petition Against Union Recognition in Industrial Dispute. Court upholds Industrial Court's finding that petitioner failed to prove loss of majority support by respondent union under Section 22 of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition Against Commercial Court in Arbitration Matter. Commercial Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Petitioner Estopped from Challenging Jurisdiction After Having Earlier Invoked It.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the LXXXV Additional City Civil a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Food Corporation of India for Non-Compliance of Regularisation Orders — No Willful Disobedience Found as Corporation Took Steps Towards Compliance

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of contempt petitions filed by workmen unions against the Food Corporation of India (FCI) for alleged non-complian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Transfer as Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of Employee After 28 Years of Service to Chennai Held Malafide and Without Justification Under Items 3 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Sulzer Pumps India Private Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Thane, which declared that the employer had engag...