Search Results for "possession delay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "possession delay"

3768 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3768 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation for Possession Under Order XXI Rule 95 CPC — Starting Point of Limitation is Date Sale Becomes Absolute, Not Date of Sale Certificate. Article 134 of Limitation Act, 1963 governs application under Order XXI Rule 95 CPC, and limitation runs from confirmation of sale under Rule 92(1), not from issuance of sale certificate.

1 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court dismissing a civil revision application filed by the appellants, who were judgment-debtors. ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

21 Dec 2010

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Specific Performance Suit by Reversing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Agreements and Memoranda of Understanding Interpreted Together as Supplementary, with Appellants Found Ready and Willing to Perform Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

9 Apr 2021

The dispute arose from four suits filed by the Appellants for specific performance of agreements of sale dated 20.03.1991 and memoranda of understandi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act — Land Not Acquired Due to Non-Compliance with Section 10(3) and Section 11(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The court held that mere notification does not vest land in the State without actual possession, and exemption applications under Sections 20 and 21 must be considered before declaring land surplus.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Bhagwant Dharmaraj Radke and Omprakash @ Dipchand Durgaprasad Agrawal against the State of Mahara...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Possession Suit — Sub-Lease Without Consent Validates Eviction. Tenant's unauthorized sub-lease of suit premises to third parties constitutes ground for eviction under Section 108(h) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and landlord entitled to possession and mesne profits.

9 Oct 2015

The plaintiff, Mohammad Ali, filed a suit for recovery of possession and arrears of rent against the first defendant, Surendra Darappa Shetty, and two...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KIADB Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Preliminary Notification and Section 28(3) Notification Held Abandoned Due to Non-Completion of Acquisition Within Reasonable Time. Land Acquisition Lapse Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 — Delay of Over 13 Years Without Possession or Compensation Leads to Abandonment.

30 May 2022

The Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against an order of a learned Single Judge d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Defendants, Confirming that Document Dated 05.06.1953 is a Mortgage, Not an Agreement of Sale. The Court Upheld the Concurrent Findings of the Lower Courts that the Transaction was a Loan with Possession of Land as Security, and the Plaintiff was Entitled to Possession.

21 Aug 2013

The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that a document dated 05.06.1953, styled as an agreement of sale (Isar Pawati), was actually a m...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures. Failure to Join Independent Witnesses and Non-Production of Seized Contraband Before Court Renders Conviction Unsustainable Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act, 1985.

15 Dec 2021

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Mustaq Ahamed alias Maamu and Siraj Basha alias Siraj alias Gunda against the judgment of conviction a...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Lapse of Land Acquisition by BDA; Petitioners Seek Declaration Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Citing Failure to Pay Compensation and Take Possession. The court considered whether non-payment of compensation and retention of land without utilization for layout constituted abandonment despite BDA's claim of possession taken and land earmarked for park.

18 Jul 2017

The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court, clubbed together due to common ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation in Mutation Entry Challenge. Court holds that delay in challenging mutation entry cannot be attributed to petitioner when authorities failed to comply with statutory duty under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

2 Mar 2023

The petitioners, Shankarrao Premaji Banarase and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the order dated 30/0...

67 68 69 70 71

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)