Search Results for "notice under CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "notice under CPC"

3639 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3639 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Dismissal of Eviction Suit Based on Alleged Admission in Another Suit. Admission in Additional Written Statement in Different Suit Cannot Be Used to Dismiss Eviction Suit Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC as It Is Not Clear and Unambiguous.

6 Jul 2017

The Petitioner, Mr. Firoze Adi Vakil, as Defendant No.1B in RAE & R Suit No.744/1770 of 1992, filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Written Statement Filing in Civil Suit — Order 8 Rule 1 CPC Held Directory Not Mandatory. The court declined to interfere under Article 227 as the trial court's order was not perverse or illegal.

8 Sep 2025

The petitioners, who were defendants in a civil suit (O.S.No.6032/2017) pending before the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, filed a writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Earnest Money Under Oral Agreement. Oral Agreement for Sale Does Not Fall Within Order 37 CPC Categories, Hence Unconditional Leave to Defend Granted.

30 Jan 2018

The respondent-plaintiff filed Special Civil Suit No.120 of 2017 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, seeking recovery of Rs.12,00,000/- (inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Cooperative Court to Decide Interim Application in Society Redevelopment Dispute. Minority Members' Challenge to Resolutions Led to High Court Direction Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Avoid Delay in Redevelopment.

23 Dec 2021

The case pertains to a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by MP Space Dynamics Pvt. Ltd., the developer, aga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC in Mortgage Dispute Between Flat Purchasers and Bank. The court held that a civil suit seeking declaration that a mortgage is not valid and for specific performance of an agreement to purchase flats is not barred under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, as the reliefs are outside the jurisdiction of the DRT.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a common judgment of the Bombay High Court which had allowed notices of motion filed by Axis Bank Ltd. (r...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Land Development Dispute, Restoring Tribunal's Findings on Breach and Damages. The Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Holding that High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Re-evaluating Factual Determinations.

21 Apr 2025

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 30th April 2015, which was rendered in appeals under Section 37 ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, hears a company petition for winding up of Videocon Industries Limited under sections 433(e) and 434(1)(a) read with 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petition, filed by an Italian bank, alleges non-payment of Euros 38 million under a Patronage Letter, which the petitioner argues is a guarantee for a loan to a step-down subsidiary.

5 Dec 2013

The petition, Company Petition No. 528 of 2012, was filed by Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A., an Italian bank, seeking the winding up of Videocon Industries Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

24 May 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Plaintiff's Omission to Seek Leave for Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance After Earlier Injunction Suit Results in Bar.

27 Nov 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) in a Second Appeal, which upheld the concurrent findings of the Trial Court ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application in Commercial Suit for Possession. The Court held that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and the question of limitation was a mixed question of fact and law, not amenable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

25 Jun 2025

The petitioners, who were defendants in a commercial suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff, challenged an order dated 28.02.2025 passed by the IV Add...

67 68 69 70 71

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)