Search Results for "Seized articles"

2660 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2660 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and In-Laws for Murder by Burning in Dowry Death Case. Life Imprisonment Maintained Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence.

The case arises from a criminal appeal filed by four accused persons (husband, father-in-law, brother-in-law, and mother-in-law of the deceased) again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl — Rarest of Rare Case. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC for the brutal murder of a 4-year-old girl, finding the circumstantial evidence complete and the crime falling within the rarest of rare category.

The case involves the confirmation of a death sentence and an appeal against conviction. The accused, Ravi s/o Ashok Ghumare, was convicted by the Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Murder Case Arising from Land Dispute. The appeals challenge convictions under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 based on inconsistencies in evidence and medical reports.

The appeals arose from a judgment dated 23.12.1999 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, convicting five out of nineteen accused fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder. Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Discovery of Weapon Upheld Under Section 302 IPC.

The judgment dismissed an appeal against a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellant, convicted for murder, challenge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Railway Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Possession of railway property without proof of knowledge or reason to believe it is railway property does not attract Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Bhagwat Rajaram Patil, was the owner of a rolling mill at Manyarkheda, Jalgaon. On 18 July 1999, the Railway Protection Force (RPF) co...