Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

1708 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1708 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat Settlement — Minor's Interest Not Protected. Court sets aside compromise decree as minor defendant was not properly represented and compromise was not in his interest under Order 32 Rule 7 CPC.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from the decision of a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 2965/2011, which had upheld a compromise dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat Settlement — Minor's Interest Not Protected. Failure to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem for Minor Defendant Renders Compromise Decree Voidable Under Order 32 Rule 7 CPC.

The Letters Patent Appeal was filed by Mangesh, a minor, through his next friend Ambika Manik Mane, challenging the decision of a learned Single Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Explosives License Cancellation and Police Action Against Fireworks Traders. Court Holds That Natural Justice Violation Is Outweighed by Public Safety Concerns Under Explosives Act, 1884 and Section 144 CrPC.

The petitioners, ten firms and individuals engaged in the sale of fireworks and explosives in Sultanpet, Bangalore, challenged the cancellation of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice Under Gujarat Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 2012. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Article 300A of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Kureshi Irfanbhai Mohammadsharifbhai and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...