Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

935 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 935 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Smuggling of High Speed Diesel. Non-Supply of Bail Order Held Not Fatal to Detention Order as Detenu Was Aware of It.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Samad Ismail Deshmukh, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the deten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Invalid Delegation of Powers. Delegation Order Under Section 3(2) Must Record Satisfaction Based on Material and Reasons; Absence Renders Delegation and Subsequent Detention Orders Invalid.

The petitioner, Alakshit Rajesh Ambade, challenged the legality of a preventive detention order dated 02.07.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 35 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Srinivasan, father of the detenu Indhu @ Indumathi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds. Failure to Supply Copies of Documents Relied Upon Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, challenged a detention order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Documents. Failure to Furnish Copies of Relied-Upon Documents to Detenu Violates Article 22(5) and Section 8 of MPDA Act, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court (Circuit Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.

The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenue. Failure to Provide Grounds in Hindi or Marathi Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Tuljaram Bandichode, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA) by an order dated 10...