Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

768 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 768 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Challenging High Court’s Order Dismissing Absorption Claims of Temporary LIC Workers. The Court interprets the compromise reached in earlier SLP and the distinction between absorption and recruitment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

This group of civil appeals by various employee associations challenged the Delhi High Court's common judgment dismissing their appeals and affirming ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal Award Granting Merger of Dearness Allowance with Basic Pay for Municipal Employees. The court held that the Tribunal's decision to merge DA with basic pay and grant consequential benefits was within its jurisdiction and not perverse.

The petitioner, Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation, challenged an award dated 28 February 2011 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Sangli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Open University Degree is Equivalent for Promotion to Junior Research Assistant; Petitioners Challenge Communications Rejecting Equivalence.

Sixty‑two petitioners employed as Agriculture Assistants at Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, approached the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Property Suit — No Prima Facie Case Made Out for Injunction Against Co-Owners. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Exclusive Possession or Irreparable Injury, and Balance of Convenience Did Not Favor Injunction.

The appellant, Sri Sriramulu, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...