Search Results for "CPC applicability"

769 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 769 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers — Sets Aside Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession. Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership and Adverse Possession Against Co-Owner Brother.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 07.11.2007 in O.S.No.3163/1990 passed by the XV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Sri B.S. Lakshman, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Juvenile Status and Inconsistent Evidence. Claim of juvenility at time of offence not properly considered; conviction under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Channappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No. 40/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 302 read with 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of Employee Due to Lack of Safety Measures. Employer and Principal Employer Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the legal representatives of the deceased Chinnaswamy, who died due to electrocution on 14.08.2013 while workin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Electricity Tariff Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

The judgment pertains to four Civil Review Applications (Nos. 23, 24, 25 and 26 of 2011) filed by industrial consumers against the State of Goa and th...