Search Results for "registration date"

8396 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8396 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of President's Election for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate. Section 51-1B of Maharashtra Municipal Council Act, 1965 Mandates Strict Compliance; Failure Results in Deemed Termination.

The petitioner, Sanjay Nathalal Gohil, was elected as President of the Municipal Council, Pachora. The District Collector passed an order dated 23rd J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Dismissal of Appeal as Time-Barred Under Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Limitation Runs from Date of Knowledge of Order.

The petitioner, Smt. Lalita Dhanraj Jadhav, challenged the order dated 16/06/2020 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Juvenile Status and Inconsistent Evidence. Claim of juvenility at time of offence not properly considered; conviction under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Channappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No. 40/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 302 read with 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Industrial Park Scheme Benefits. Interpretation of Section 80IA(4)(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Industrial Park Scheme 2002 requires strict compliance with conditions for deduction.

The petitioners, M/s. Silver Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order da...