CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3931 OF 2016
14 Dec 2016The petitioner, a former PWD Minister of Maharashtra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his ar...
Search Results for "property fraud"
2285 result(s) found
Found 2285 result(s)
High Court
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favour of Plaintiff-Builder Under Memorandum of Understanding. The court held that the Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.5.2011 constituted a binding agreement for sale and the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
5 May 2017The appellant, M/s. Merces Builders Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.4.2016 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Panaji...
- 128
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Provisional Attachment Orders Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — Lack of Reasonable Belief and Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Attachment orders set aside as customs authorities failed to demonstrate reasonable belief that goods were liable to confiscation and did not follow mandatory procedure under Section 110(3) requiring notice within six months.
13 Mar 2024The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Chokshi Arvind Jewellers and Pallav Gold, challenging provisional attachment orders passed by t...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Applicant in Property Fraud Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Allegations of forgery and cheating in sale of Russian Federation property fail to establish criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC against the applicant who was a subsequent purchaser.
2 May 2011The case involves a property dispute over Marine House, a property owned by the erstwhile U.S.S.R. and later vested in the Russian Federation. In Dece...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.
7 Sep 2016This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...
- 23
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Disposes of Appeals Challenging Apportionment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. Reference Court Had Awarded Entire Compensation to One Party Without Framing Issues or Properly Evaluating Evidence Under Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
12 Oct 2017The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard three first appeals against the judgment of the Reference Court dated 15.07.2010, which had awarded the entire c...
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Second Appeal and Upholds First Appellate Court’s Decree for Specific Performance in Property Sale Agreement. Failure to Appoint Guardian-ad-Litem for Minor Defendant and Non-Challenge to Subsequent Sale Deeds Are Key Issues Under Section 100 CPC.
20 Sep 2019The Second Appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property. The plaintiff (respondent no.1) claimed that ...
- 24
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Remand Order in Civil Suit for Cancellation of Sale Deed - Directs Trial Court to Decide Based on Existing Evidence. The Court held that remand for de novo trial was unjustified as the Trial Court had already recorded evidence and decided on merits under Section 103 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, with no exceptional circumstances present.
27 Feb 2023The appeal arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Kerala dated 28.06.2019, which disposed of four appeals related to civil suits between si...
- 230
High Court
High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Property Appeal Despite 14-Year Delay. Application under Order XXII Rule 10 read with Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 granted as no time limit prescribed for devolution of interest, and impleadment avoids abatement without prejudice to appellants.
5 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a suit for possession filed in 1974, which was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs in 2011. The defendants appealed, and during ...
- 459
