Search Results for "oral evidence required"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "oral evidence required"

10205 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10205 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Cross-Examine Autopsy Surgeon on Treatment Papers in Murder Trial — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Cross-Examination on Documents Not Formally Proved. The court held that the right of cross-examination is a valuable right and cannot be curtailed by a narrow interpretation of Section 294 CrPC, and the accused must be allowed to challenge the doctor's opinion on the basis of treatment papers produced by him.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioners, original accused in Sessions Case No. 153 of 2015 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, are charged under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.

29 Jul 2005

The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Petitioner failed to establish employer-employee relationship with respondent company as he was engaged through a contractor.

23 Mar 2005

The petitioner, M.G. Bhide, filed a complaint before the Industrial Court at Pune under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree in Flat Sale Dispute — Agreement to Sell Enforceable Despite Alleged Breach of Conditions. Court holds that time was not of essence in the agreement and that the purchaser was ready and willing to perform, directing execution of sale deed within two months.

12 Jun 2023

The case involves an appeal against a judgment and decree dated 07/08/2013 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Bombay, in Regular C...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

11 Feb 2026

The appellant, Dansinh Rupsinh Parmar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Second Fast Track Court, Amreli in Special Case (ACB) No. 47/19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Unexplained Delay. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 4, 6, 10 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

30 Jul 2024

The appellant, Rajesh Murlidhar Lonbale, was convicted by the Special Judge under Sections 376(1), 376(2)(l) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sectio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Disposes of Cross Appeals in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Arising from Cart Track Dispute. The Court applies the principle that cross cases are to be tried independently but may be disposed by a common judgment to avoid inconsistency, examining evidence under Sections 302, 307, 34 IPC and Sections 372, 374(2) CrPC.

30 Jan 2024

The High Court of Karnataka heard two criminal appeals arising from a single incident on 19 October 1998 at Ummadahalli Village, Mandya District. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Election Petition Alleging Improper Rejection of Votes and Irregular Draw of Lots. Court Examines Whether Returning Officer Erroneously Invalidated Votes Under Section 100(1)(d)(iii) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and Whether Section 65 Overrides Rule 75(4) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961.

13 Jan 2015

The case involves an election petition filed under Section 81 read with Section 100(1)(d)(iii) and (iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Misapplication of Section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Charge Framed Under Wrong Provision Invalidates Conviction

5 Jul 2024

The appellant, a Junior Clerk in a Sessions Court, was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholding High Court's Decision on Share Entitlement and Appellate Jurisdiction. The court held that in a partition suit, parties' positions are interchangeable, allowing appellate relief to non-appealing plaintiffs under Order XLI Rule 4 and Rule 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and that second appeals can address factual issues if findings are perverse.

21 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a partition suit filed by plaintiff Nos. 1 to 8 (respondent Nos. 1 to 8) against defendant No. 1 (appellant) regarding shares in...

66 67 68 69 70

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)