Search Results for "muddemal"

924 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 924 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Family Feud Case. Court acquits three other accused due to lack of evidence, finding that the prosecution failed to prove their involvement beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two cross appeals arising from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, dated October 9, 1987, in Sessions Case No.84 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search by Police Officer Without Informing Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Invalidates Conviction for Possession of Ganja

The appellant, Manoj @ Lakhan Laxman Gavai, was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii) B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive, Last Seen Evidence, and Recovery of Articles.

The appellant, Pramil @ Premanand Rao, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder and r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Contradict Each Other and Lack Corroboration.

The appellant, Pradeep Ramchandra Pawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara for the murder of his wife Sunita by pouring kerosene and setting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence in Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl - Accused's Appeal Dismissed. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and medical evidence held sufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 364, 366, 376, 377, 302, 201 IPC.

The case pertains to the kidnapping, rape, and murder of an 11-year-old girl named Bhagyashree on 10.11.2004. The accused, Arjun Laxman Jogadiya alias...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consent. Prosecutrix's Age Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused Under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Sanjay Jagannath Ursal, was convicted by the IV Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on June 30, 2003 in Sessions Case No.210 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Dacoity to Robbery with Hurt in Appeal Against Sessions Court Judgment. Appellant Convicted Under Section 394 IPC Instead of Sections 395 and 397 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence of Five Persons for Dacoity.

The appellant, Balu Pandharinath Takle, was one of four accused charged with dacoity under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Voluntary Accompaniment. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Conduct and Delayed FIR Undermine Allegations Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Rajan Kannan Padiyachi, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.159 of 1997 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 397 IPC set aside as sole identifying witness failed to provide consistent description and no independent corroboration of recovery.

The appellant, Rakesh Harilal Kahar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai on November 30, 2001, in Sessions Case No.250 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Belief and Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Mohd. Akram Mohd. Majij Shaikh, was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Special ...