Search Results for "medical contradictions"

1602 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1602 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Niranjan s/o Vishnu Chavan, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, for an offence punishable under Section 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Vishwas @ Guddu Rajesh Dahiwale, Kamlesh @ Kamya Kalidas Patil, and Suraj Raju Manwatkar, were convicted by the trial court for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Raju s/o Nagnath @ Nivrutti Sardiwal (Pardeshi), was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for the murder of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 376D IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was uncorroborated and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Rohidas Manik Chavhan and Pravin Pundlik Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, in Special Case No.4/2015 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves a criminal appeal against conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder. The appellant, Feroz Khan s/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC. The Appeals Challenge Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence, Including Decomposed Body Identification and Extra-Judicial Confession.

The appeals arose from a conviction by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 246 of 1997, where the accused were found ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010383542014_1

The appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 12.06.2014 and order of sentence dated 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Acquittal and Conviction in Wife's Burn Death Case. The Appeals Arise from Trial Court Verdict Convicting Husband for Murder Under Section 302 IPC While Acquitting Him and In-Laws of Dowry Harassment.

Background: This matter involves three criminal appeals before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arising from the judgment of the Additional Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicts in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC. High Court's affirmation of life imprisonment upheld based on eyewitness testimony and discovery of weapons, despite challenges to evidence reliability.

The appeal arose from a murder conviction where two appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, a...