Search Results for "cross examination"

9743 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9743 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Government Officials in RTO Office Shooting. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 307, 332, 333, 201 and Arms Act Sections 3 and 25 Challenged; Trial Court Had Sentenced Appellant to Life Imprisonment.

The case pertains to a shooting incident on 30th May 2009 at the Regional Transport Office (RTO) in Aurangabad. The appellant's father, Rameshwar Taya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Damages Award in Illegal Termination Suit; Cross-Objection for Higher Damages Also Considered. Judgment Under Section 96 CPC and Order XLI Rule 1 is Delivered After Remand for Quantification.

This case involved the challenge to the termination of a managerial employee in a private limited company. H.R. Thimmappa Gowda joined Goetze (India) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit — Upholds Finding That Properties Were Self-Acquired. Daughters Granted Equal 1/6th Share Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as Father Died Intestate.

The case involves a partition suit filed by three daughters (Plaintiffs) against their brother (Defendant No.1) and others, seeking a share in propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye-Witness and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for wife's murder set aside as sole eye-witness's testimony found inconsistent and inquest panchanama conducted at hospital instead of spot.

The appellant, Ashok Ratan Sonawne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager and Co-accused in Branch Arson Case. Probation Benefit Denied for Offence Under Section 436 IPC as It Carries Life Imprisonment.

The case arises from an incident where the Poladpur branch of Mahad Co-Operative Urban Bank was set on fire on the night of 5th/6th September 1986. Th...