Search Results for "advance purchase"

1272 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1272 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 -- MOU Found Not Amenable to Specific Performance Due to Third-Party Litigation

The High Court dismissed an Arbitration Petition challenging an Arbitral Award that rejected claims for specific performance of a Memorandum of Unders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Prove Loan Repayment or Dispute Existence of Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant-complainant, Sri Krishna Reddy M, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance to Include Alternative Relief of Refund of Advance Amount. Amendment Sought Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

The petitioner, M/s. Samrudhi Groups, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.281/2017) against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert, and Suit Property Not Identified.

The appellant, M/s. Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC against the judgment and decree dated 30.04.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Accident Victim and Fixes Liability on Insurance Company in Motor Vehicle Accident Case. Claimant sustained grievous injuries due to driver's negligence; Insurance Company held liable as no evidence of invalid license.

The case involves an appeal filed by the claimant under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 27.06...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract for Sale of Agricultural Land.

The appellant/plaintiff Palanivel filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated February 22, 2008, whereby the first defendant B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement of Sale Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Show Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The plaintiff Palanivel filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated February 22, 2008, whereby the first defendant Balasubrama...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in KVAT Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Assessee Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Third Party. Section 39(1) Reassessment Set Aside as Assessing Authority Relied on Ex-Parte Statements Without Providing Opportunity to Rebut.

The petitioner, M/s. TTP Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a registered company represented by its Director Sri. M. Devarajaiah, filed writ petitions under Arti...