Search Results for "Writ jurisdiction Article 227"

3575 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3575 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction — Orders Passed Without Deciding Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Are Illegal. Trial Court Must First Decide Preliminary Issue of Jurisdiction Before Proceeding with Interim Applications.

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 13.04.2017 and 17.07.2017 passed by the X...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Division Bench of Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 by Temple Trusts. Petitioners Allege Amendment Is Discriminatory and Violative of Fundamental Rights Under Constitution.

The petitioners, comprising 64 Hindu religious institutions and charitable trusts from various districts of Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Stay Damages Claim in Admiralty Suit for Wrongful Arrest of Bunkers. Court Examines Argument That Suit for Interim Security Pending Arbitration Does Not Disclose Cause of Action, Reliance on BALCO Judgment.

An admiralty suit was filed by a foreign company against, inter alia, the bunkers on board the vessel M.V. African Eagle and its charterers, seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Writ Petition Challenging Section 28-A Award as Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy. Acquiring Body Cannot Seek Reference Under Section 28-A(3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Not a 'Person Interested' and Is Barred by Section 50(2).

The Bombay High Court dealt with three writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited, the acquiring body for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal, Holds Section 84 Not an Alternative to Section 29(1) in Bombay Tenancy Act. Court Rules Invalid Surrender Does Not Entitle Tenant to Summary Eviction Under Section 84, Remedy Lies with Mamlatdar Under Section 29(1).

The dispute arose under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Respondent 1, the landowner, owned two survey numbers in Panchmahals, Guj...