Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1775 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1775 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Permitting Recall and Reopening of Evidence in Civil Suit Due to Impermissible Filling of Lacunae. Recalling Witness Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Cannot Be Used to Adduce Additional Evidence After Deletion of Rule 17A, Especially When Prior Admissions Exist.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed in 2010 seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction over certain properties. The appellant, de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons Filed to Introduce Additional Evidence in Appeal Related to Specific Performance" "Court emphasizes the discretionary nature of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC and deters misuse aimed at prolonging litigation."

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Chamber Summons filed under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the CPC by the Appellants seeking to produce additional evide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by Calcutta High Court in Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case — CBI Investigation Undermined by Premature Release. Reverse Burden of Proof Under Section 436A CrPC Not Applicable Where Investigation Ongoing and Trial Not Commenced.

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the grant of bail to multiple accused persons in connection with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Alleging Deceptive Similarity in Beer Trade Marks. Plaintiff Claims 'Hercules Black Label' Infringes 'Kalyani Black Label'.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard an appeal filed by United Breweries Ltd (plaintiff) against the judgment and decree of the XXV Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Compensation Award Not Challenged on Merits. Petitioners' Challenge to Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Fails as They Did Not Seek Reference for Higher Compensation and Acquiesced to Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Anwar Hajee Alimohammed Hajee Cassum Agboatwala and other co-owners, filed a writ petition under Ar...