SECOND APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2008
21 Mar 2017...
Search Results for "Summary Rejection"
740 result(s) found
Found 740 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Compensation Claim by Co-owner Under National Highways Act, 1956 — Interpretation of Section 3-H(3) and (4) Clarified. The court held that when a dispute arises regarding apportionment of compensation among co-owners, the Land Acquisition Officer must refer the matter to arbitration under Section 3-H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956, and cannot reject the claim on the ground of disputed title.
29 Jun 2017The petitioner, Arun Trimbakrao Lokare, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 05.01.2017 pas...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Res Judicata Case — Suit Not Barred as Earlier Suit Was Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Earlier Suit Was Not Decided on Merits.
29 Jun 2017The revision application arose from an order of the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, rejecting the defendant's application under Order ...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and Amounting to De Jure Inability to Act.
30 Nov 2017The petitioners, original claimants in arbitral proceedings, filed a petition under Section 14(2) and Section 32(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Defendant to File Written Statement After Delay in Civil Suit — Imposition of Costs Justified. No Interference Under Article 227 as Trial Court's Discretion Was Not Perverse or Jurisdictional Error.
1 Mar 2018The petitioner, Dr. Milind Arvind Killedar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 14.11.2016...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Dispute — Deemed Tenant Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation. The court held that the petitioners failed to establish that their predecessor was a tenant under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958, and the concurrent findings of the authorities below were not perverse.
2 Nov 2018The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of Ramchandra Ganpat Bhure, filed an application before the Tahsildar under sections 43, 46, and 49 of the...
- 125
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Workmen Under Industrial Dispute Act. Held that termination without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and workmen are entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
27 Sep 2019The case involves an appeal filed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and its officer against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka H...
- 55
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Return of Plaint on Pecuniary Jurisdiction Grounds. The court held that the Trial Court must determine jurisdiction based on proper valuation and cannot merely accept the plaintiff's valuation without scrutiny.
13 Jan 2016The petitioners, defendants in a civil suit, challenged an order of the IV Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Belgaum, dated 19.09.2014, rejecting their...
- 109
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Dismissal by Tribunal — Claimants Entitled to Compensation for Death of Injured Person. The court held that the legal representatives of a deceased who died due to accident injuries can file a fresh claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, even if the deceased had filed a petition for injuries during his lifetime.
26 Jun 2015The appeal arises from the judgment and award dated 3rd May 2013 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and M.A.C.T., Bangalore, in M.V.C.No....
- 60
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant's Title and Possession Over Land Not Extinguished by Acquisition Proceedings. The court held that the appellant had locus standi to challenge the acquisition and that the delay was not fatal as possession continued.
14 Jul 2026The appellant, Sri V Sreenivasaiah, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 25.02.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 2228/2022, w...
- 73
