WRIT PETITION NO.2669 OF 2018
1 Aug 2018Background - The dispute involves appointment of a full-time lecturer in Marathi at Vijaysinh Yadav Art, Commerce and Science College, Peth Vadgaon, r...
Search Results for "Status Quo Order"
1715 result(s) found
Found 1715 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application for Possession Restoration and Injunction in a Suit Filed Under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The plaintiffs sought interim restoration of possession and injunction against alienation, alleging forcible dispossession from commercial premises after years of possession and investment.
16 Oct 2025The dispute involved a suit filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, by Ashapura Options Private Limited and others against Ashapura De...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Goa University Against Injunction in Easement Dispute. Right of Way Claim Upheld Based on Long User and Necessity Under Indian Easements Act, 1882.
27 Apr 2017The case involves an appeal by Goa University (original defendants) against an order dated 24.06.2016 passed by the District Judge-1, North Goa, Panaj...
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Trial Court's Injunction in Society Dispute — High Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Article 227 When Appeal Was Available Under CPC. The availability of an appellate remedy under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 bars the High Court from exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, and the trial court's speedy disposal of an injunction application within the statutory time frame cannot be termed as hurried without merits.
3 Oct 2019The case arises from a dispute within a society, where the appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit seeking declarations and injunctions regarding the con...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction Over Originating Summons in Lease Dispute Where Defendant Has Filed Separate Eviction Suit. The Court Examines Whether the Filing of a Suit Under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, After the Originating Summons Ousts the High Court's Jurisdiction.
29 Apr 2014This case involved a dispute between Century Textiles and Industries Ltd. (plaintiff) and Nusli Neville Wadia (defendant) arising out of a 999-year le...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows BDA Appeal, Sets Aside Interim Status Quo Order in Land Acquisition Dispute. Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Plaintiff's Sale Deeds After Acquisition Confer No Title or Lawful Possession.
27 Aug 2013The appeal by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) arose from an interim order passed by the City Civil Court in OS 7025/2012, which directed mai...
- 60
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case for Withdrawal of CIRP Based on Settlement Before CoC Constitution. Withdrawal Application Under Section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Granted as Settlement Was Genuine and Committee of Creditors Not Constituted, Invoking Inherent Powers Under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016.
28 Mar 2023The dispute arose from an appeal filed by a suspended director of Manpasand Beverages Ltd., the corporate debtor, against an order of the National Com...
- 358
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Tenancy Dispute. Failure to Consider Evidence and Provide Hearing Leads to Remand Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.
13 Mar 2024The petitioners, legal representatives of the original applicant Narasappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...
- 104
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order in Service Transfer Matter — Petitioner Fails to Establish Jurisdictional Error. The Court upheld the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal's interim order directing status quo regarding the transfer of a District Health Officer, finding no perversity or lack of jurisdiction in the Tribunal's decision.
15 Dec 2022The petitioner, Dr. Patil Shashi, a District Health and Family Welfare Officer, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging a...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Industrial Dispute As Labour Court Retains Jurisdiction Under Section 33(3) Despite Disposal of Main Reference. Application for Discharge of Protected Workman Must Be Decided on Merits Even After Award of Reference; Section 33(3) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Mandates Adjudication of Pending Applications.
7 Feb 1968The dispute arose from the respondent State Bank of India's decision to dismiss the appellant P.D. Sharma, a protected workman, during the pendency of...
- 55
